Skip to main content

ANALYSIS OF THE NEWSPAPER REVITALIZATION ACT

The Newspaper Revitalization Act introduced by Sen. Benjamin Cardin, D-Md., would permit newspapers to operate as not-for-profit entities under the tax code and is being heralded by some observers as a means of saving newspapers, much as was the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970. Good purposes aside, it is useful to study the act to determine whether it will actually accomplish the goals that are stated as its rationale.

The bill is a small bill, about 435 words, that would amend the IRS Code of 1986 to permit newspapers to be given 501(c)(3) status, thus obtaining tax exempt status and the ability to accept charitable contributions. Currently tax laws do not permit newspapers to be operated tax exempt, but they do have mechanisms that permit foundations to own them or support them financially.

Paragraph (b)(1) of the bill would allow general circulation newspapers “publishing on a regular basis” to establish themselves as tax exempt organizations. The language does not limit periodicity so daily, bi-weekly, weekly, monthly, and other combinations would be possible. It would thus permit a range of neighborhood and community non-dailies, as well as dailies to use the mechanism.

Paragraph (b)(2) stipulates that the newspaper contain “local, national, and international news stories.” This section is somewhat problematic because non-dailies, particularly neighborhood and community papers, do not typically carry national and international news and nationally oriented dailies do not typically carry local news. The bill contains no provisions that require local creation of content, thus allowing publishers to fill a paper only with syndicated material or other content produced elsewhere.

Paragraph (c) permits advertising, but limits it “to the extent that the space allotted to all such advertisements….does not exceed the space allotted to fulfilling the educational purpose of such qualified newspaper corporation.” This provision is apparently intended to ensure advertising does not dominate the content and effectively limits advertising to 50 percent of the content. This provision, however, is problematic because daily newspapers and most non-dailies currently contain two-thirds to three-quarters advertising. Indeed the regulations governing Post Office (USPS) distribution limit advertising to 75 percent.

The bill does not require that newspapers have paid subscriptions or even requests to receive the paper, as do USPS regulations, so it would apply free circulation papers.

By giving not-for-profit status to newspapers, the bill would also make the paper eligible for USPS not-for-profit rates, which would permit lower postal delivery rates for such papers than those afforded for-profit papers. This might raise issues regarding the fairness of competition if commercial publishers exist in the market

It should also be noted that the bill makes no provision to limit payments to publishers and editors. This creates the potential for some abuse. A small commercial publisher could use the mechanism to become “non profit” to avoid company taxes by not taking compensation from profits but taking a higher salary instead—effectively letting tax payers subsidize his/her income.

One drawback of using 501(c)(3) status is that entities are not permitted to engage in direct political activities, such as endorsing candidates for local, state, or national office or possibly even taking positions on governmental proposals. This would somewhat limit the scope of content and could lead to IRS investigations if complaints were made to the IRS that a paper was taking sides, was too conservative or liberal, or evidenced some other kind of agenda that was deemed political activity.

It appears that the overall effect of the bill would be limited. It will be appealing to very few dailies and most neighborhood and community papers will have difficulties complying with its content and advertising requirements. Even with tax exempt status, the costs of creation, publishing, distribution of a newspaper probably can not be covered by many publishers with a 50 percent ad limit, unless they are especially effective at raising charitable contributions over time.

The bill appears to be well intentioned, however, it can not solve the problem it purports to address in its current form and creates potential for some abuse.

Popular posts from this blog

CAN PUBLIC BROADCASTERS HARM COMPETITION AND DIVERSITY?

This is not trick question and it is being increasingly asked as public broadcasters grow larger, offer multiple channels, move into cross-media operations, and increasingly commercialize their operations. The Federal Communications Commission will have to consider that question shortly when it considers the effort of WGBH Education Foundation—operator of WGBH-TV, the highly successful Boston-based public service broadcaster—to purchase the commercial radio station WCRB-FM. WGBH is the top ranked member of the Public Broadcasting Service in the New England and produces about one third of PBS’ programming. It operates a second Boston television station, WGBX-TV, and WGBY in Springfield, Massachusetts. In addition it operates FM radio stations WGBH (Boston), WCAI (Woods Hole), WZAI (Brewster), and WNAN (Nantucket) and is a member of National Public Radio and Public Radio International. It operates two commercial subsidiaries involved in music rights and motion picture production. This mo...

Slow down

Estamos na última semana do verão e por aqui o tempo continua bem bom. Claro que não está mais tanto calor como em Agosto, mas ainda consigo andar de camisolas e tops de alças, t-shirts, vestidos e saias. Num ou noutro dia lá precisei de um blazer ou quimono de manhã cedinho ou de noite, mas ainda está calor. E o que é que eu quero com este paleio todo? Não, não é conversa de circunstância vir aqui falar do tempo. Só me chateia um bocado ver imensa gente já cheia de frio e em colecções de outono dos pés à cabeça quando ainda temos muitos dias com máximas perto dos 30º!! Really!!! Eu já dei uma olhada nas novas colecções e já me apetece o frio para vestir-me em layers, cores mais escuras, malhas, mas calma... O chinelo no pé e a sandália ainda estão mais do que permitidos! Porque já andam de botas, camisolas com gola e manga comprida, casacos de couro... se está tanto calor? Estamos em Setembro, ainda está bom tempo, não andem por aí cheias de roupa da nova colecção, qual vitrina da...

Why should you have a uniform?

Desde maio que não partilhava um look meu aqui! Oh-Meu-Deus!!!! IMENSO!!! Acho que nunca estive tanto tempo sem publicar por cá os meus outfits, mas a verdade é que não tenho tido tempos mortos para conseguir fotografar. Quando tenho tempo não tenho fotógrafo disponível. Este foi o look que usei no jantar do meu aniversário, há mais de um mês, I know, e é daqueles looks bem simples mas que resultam sempre lindamente. Eu adoro este tipo de combinações. E não podia ser mais apropriado aos últimos meses que têm sido non stop. Confesso que cada vez mais sou adepta de deixar pronta a roupa que vou vestir no dia seguinte antes de dormir. Pensar no que vou vestir antes de sair para o trabalho acaba por me gastar demasiados minutos, ainda não estou bem acordada, tenho o raciocínio lento, noto que perco mais tempo quando na verdade o que eu queria era ainda estar a aproveitar a cama! Não sei se são como eu ou não, mas este tipo de combinações salva-me os dias, ou melhor, uns minutos a ma...